Government 1 Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Government 1 - Dissertation Example Due to these reasons, there would be an influx of immigrants into the country as they know that the immigration policies that grant citizenship to illegal immigrants would make their lives better in the US as they would also have the same opportunity with the other citizens of the US. Thus, immigration would significantly increase if the US government is less strict on their immigration policies. It is actually not appropriate for one country to judge the cultural practice of another country. Countries should be free to practice any culture that is sovereign to them. Thus, the cultural practice of a country should not in any way be judged as long as these cultural practices are not done for the oppression of their own people. Though, there are cases that the cultural practices of some particular countries are against basic moral laws and a threat to peaceful human existence, this is not to say that it is appropriate for one country to judge the cultural practice of these countries. I n cases like that, there should be a central body that seeks to modify the cultural practice of countries that have been accused of running foul to the morality laws and these should be ably represented by nationals of all countries of the world. Thus, it is not appropriate for one country to judge the cultural practice of another.

Immigration, civil rights, terrorism Thesis Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Immigration, civil rights, terrorism - Thesis Example ally occurs through illegal crossing of border, immigration on false visas from other countries, overstaying after expiry of Visa or Border Crossing Card, drug smuggling and identity theft. USA has been critical about its immigration policy since beginning, however, the efforts became quite strong and serious with the World Trade Centre attack by Alkhaida on 11th September, 2001. In 1990 the US Congress appointed the Commission on Immigration Reform for reviewing its national policies and laws and to suggest necessary changes. In 2001, USA modified its immigration law for enhancing the ability of federal authorities to prevent foreign terrorists from entering USA and to detain foreign terrorist suspects (Charles Doyle, 2001). This led to a conflict of personal freedom and dignity enjoyed by the immigrants in USA. The person’s freedom may be severely affected by over interference of the Police as in case of Lawrence v Texas (2003). However, the social security of the nation is highly important and law on immigration has to be very transparent and efficient for controlling the element of terrorism and hence affirmative action on controlling terrorism is highly essential in USA but at the same time all possible efforts must be taken to protect the civil rights, promote racial harmony and avoid the undue interference in personal freedom of foreign nationals living inside the